↓ Skip to main content

When Is Curative Gastrectomy Justified for Gastric Cancer with Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology but Negative Macroscopic Peritoneal Implant?

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
When Is Curative Gastrectomy Justified for Gastric Cancer with Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology but Negative Macroscopic Peritoneal Implant?
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00268-005-7703-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isao Miyashiro, Ko Takachi, Yuichiro Doki, Osamu Ishikawa, Hiroaki Ohigashi, Kohei Murata, Yo Sasaki, Shingi Imaoka, Akihiko Nakaizumi, Akemi Takenaka, Hiroshi Furukawa, Masahiro Hiratsuka

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,928,972
of 10,931,245 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#564
of 2,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,680
of 103,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,931,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 51st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.