| Title |
When Is Curative Gastrectomy Justified for Gastric Cancer with Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology but Negative Macroscopic Peritoneal Implant?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-005-7703-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isao Miyashiro, Ko Takachi, Yuichiro Doki, Osamu Ishikawa, Hiroaki Ohigashi, Kohei Murata, Yo Sasaki, Shingi Imaoka, Akihiko Nakaizumi, Akemi Takenaka, Hiroshi Furukawa, Masahiro Hiratsuka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,523
of 4,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,343
of 57,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.