↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoids and Tremor Induced by Motor-related Disorders: Friend or Foe?

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Cannabinoids and Tremor Induced by Motor-related Disorders: Friend or Foe?
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13311-015-0367-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shokouh Arjmand, Zohreh Vaziri, Mina Behzadi, Hassan Abbassian, Gary J Stephens, Mohammad Shabani

Abstract

Tremor arises from an involuntary, rhythmic muscle contraction/relaxation cycle and is a common disabling symptom of many motor-related diseases such as Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, Huntington disease, and forms of ataxia. In the wake of anecdotal, largely uncontrolled, observations claiming the amelioration of some symptoms among cannabis smokers, and the high density of cannabinoid receptors in the areas responsible for motor function, including basal ganglia and cerebellum, many researchers have pursued the question of whether cannabinoid-based compounds could be used therapeutically to alleviate tremor associated with central nervous system diseases. In this review, we focus on possible effects of cannabinoid-based medicines, in particular on Parkinsonian and multiple sclerosis-related tremors and the common probable molecular mechanisms. While, at present, inconclusive results have been obtained, future investigations should extend preclinical studies with different cannabinoids to controlled clinical trials to determine potential benefits in tremor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Other 17 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 21%
Neuroscience 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#771
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,402
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.