| Title |
Genetic basis of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance using single-locus and two-locus QTL analyses in bread wheat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Functional & Integrative Genomics, February 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10142-004-0105-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. L. Kulwal, R. Singh, H. S. Balyan, P. K. Gupta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 66% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#88
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,349
of 62,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.