↓ Skip to main content

Steam explosion of straw in batch and continuous systems

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Steam explosion of straw in batch and continuous systems
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 1999
DOI 10.1385/abab:77:1-3:117
Authors

Francesco Zimbardi, Donato Viggiano, Francesco Nanna, Mario Demichele, Daniela Cuna, Giovanni Cardinale

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Engineering 3 10%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Materials Science 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#594
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,660
of 109,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.