Title |
Steam explosion of straw in batch and continuous systems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 1999
|
DOI | 10.1385/abab:77:1-3:117 |
Authors |
Francesco Zimbardi, Donato Viggiano, Francesco Nanna, Mario Demichele, Daniela Cuna, Giovanni Cardinale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Materials Science | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#594
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,660
of 109,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.