| Title |
A framework for understanding climate change impacts on coral reef social–ecological systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Environmental Change, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10113-015-0832-z |
| Authors |
Joshua Eli Cinner, Morgan Stuart Pratchett, Nicholas Anthony James Graham, Vanessa Messmer, Mariana Menezes Prata Bezerra Fuentes, Tracy Ainsworth, Natalie Ban, Line Kolind Bay, Jessica Blythe, Delphine Dissard, Simon Dunn, Louisa Evans, Michael Fabinyi, Pedro Fidelman, Joana Figueiredo, Ashley John Frisch, Christopher John Fulton, Christina Chemtai Hicks, Vimoksalehi Lukoschek, Jennie Mallela, Aurelie Moya, Lucie Penin, Jodie Lynn Rummer, Stefan Walker, David Hall Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 16 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Fiji | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 55% |
| Scientists | 26 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 401 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 19% |
| Researcher | 69 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 15% |
| Unknown | 86 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 124 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 97 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 99 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#753,572
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Regional Environmental Change
#35
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,563
of 268,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Environmental Change
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.