↓ Skip to main content

Activation via TCR or IL-2 receptor of a CD8+ suppressor T cell clone: Effect on IL-10 production and on proliferation of the suppressor T cell

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Activation via TCR or IL-2 receptor of a CD8+ suppressor T cell clone: Effect on IL-10 production and on proliferation of the suppressor T cell
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, January 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00758172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Minai, Tatsuhiro Hisatsune, Ken-Ichi Nishijima, Atsushi Enomoto, Shuichi Kaminogawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2010.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#359
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,547
of 71,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.