| Title |
Percutaneous Venous Thrombectomy Using the Arrow-Trerotola Percutaneous Thrombolytic Device (PTD) with Temporary Caval Filtration: In Vitro Investigations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-004-4100-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joachim Ernst Wildberger, Patrick Haage, Jan Bovelander, Joachim Pfeffer, Claudia Weiss, Dierk Vorwerk, Thomas Schmitz-Rode, Rolf W. Günther |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 44% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,682,308
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#676
of 2,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,269
of 60,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them