↓ Skip to main content

Experts’ recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Experts’ recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13613-015-0052-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Levy, Olivier Bastien, Karim Bendjelid, Alain Cariou, Tahar Chouihed, Alain Combes, Alexandre Mebazaa, Bruno Megarbane, Patrick Plaisance, Alexandre Ouattara, Christian Spaulding, Jean-Louis Teboul, Fabrice Vanhuyse, Thierry Boulain, Kaldoun Kuteifan

Abstract

Unlike for septic shock, there are no specific international recommendations regarding the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) in critically ill patients. We present herein recommendations for the management of cardiogenic shock in adults, developed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system by an expert group of the French-Language Society of Intensive Care (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF)), with the participation the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR), the French Cardiology Society (SFC), the French Emergency Medicine Society (SFMU), and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SFCTCV). The recommendations cover 15 fields of application such as: epidemiology, myocardial infarction, monitoring, vasoactive drugs, prehospital care, cardiac arrest, mechanical assistance, general treatments, cardiac surgery, poisoning, cardiogenic shock complicating end-stage cardiac failure, post-shock treatment, various etiologies, and medical care pathway. The experts highlight the fact that CS is a rare disease, the management of which requires a multidisciplinary technical platform as well as specialized and experienced medical teams. In particular, each expert center must be able to provide, at the same site, skills in a variety of disciplines, including medical and interventional cardiology, anesthesia, thoracic and vascular surgery, intensive care, cardiac assistance, radiology including for interventional vascular procedures, and a circulatory support mobile unit.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mauritius 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 257 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 47 18%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Master 27 10%
Other 79 30%
Unknown 23 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 194 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 31 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#608,388
of 18,206,230 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#60
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,242
of 239,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,206,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them