Title |
A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s004640020066 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G. F. Buess, A. Arezzo, M. O. Schurr, F. Ulmer, H. Fisher, L. Gumb, T. Testa, C. Nobman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 18 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
Design | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,705
of 6,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,562
of 227,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#40
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.