↓ Skip to main content

A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s004640020066
Authors

G. F. Buess, A. Arezzo, M. O. Schurr, F. Ulmer, H. Fisher, L. Gumb, T. Testa, C. Nobman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Unspecified 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 46%
Unspecified 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Computer Science 3 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#2,864,710
of 10,696,187 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#733
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,061
of 95,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,696,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 52nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.