| Title |
A Review and Evaluation of Specific Heat Capacities of Rocks, Minerals, and Subsurface Fluids. Part 2: Fluids and Porous Rocks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Resources Research, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:narr.0000032648.15016.49 |
| Authors |
Douglas W. Waples, Jacob S. Waples |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 27% |
| Researcher | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 65 | 36% |
| Engineering | 36 | 20% |
| Energy | 7 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Natural Resources Research
#46
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,858
of 62,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Resources Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them