↓ Skip to main content

A Review and Evaluation of Specific Heat Capacities of Rocks, Minerals, and Subsurface Fluids. Part 2: Fluids and Porous Rocks

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Resources Research, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
33 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Review and Evaluation of Specific Heat Capacities of Rocks, Minerals, and Subsurface Fluids. Part 2: Fluids and Porous Rocks
Published in
Natural Resources Research, June 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:narr.0000032648.15016.49
Authors

Douglas W. Waples, Jacob S. Waples

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 204 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 32%
Student > Master 35 17%
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Unspecified 11 5%
Other 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 94 44%
Engineering 48 23%
Unspecified 28 13%
Energy 10 5%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 25 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,949,374
of 13,304,005 outputs
Outputs from Natural Resources Research
#24
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,609
of 270,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Resources Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,304,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them