↓ Skip to main content

The Pliocene to recent history of the Kuroshio and Tsushima Currents: a multi-proxy approach

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
The Pliocene to recent history of the Kuroshio and Tsushima Currents: a multi-proxy approach
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40645-015-0045-6
Authors

Stephen J. Gallagher, Akihisa Kitamura, Yasufumi Iryu, Takuya Itaki, Itaru Koizumi, Peter W. Hoiles

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 49 37%
Environmental Science 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,602,901
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#90
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,067
of 264,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.