↓ Skip to main content

The Pliocene to recent history of the Kuroshio and Tsushima Currents: a multi-proxy approach

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
The Pliocene to recent history of the Kuroshio and Tsushima Currents: a multi-proxy approach
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40645-015-0045-6
Authors

Stephen J. Gallagher, Akihisa Kitamura, Yasufumi Iryu, Takuya Itaki, Itaru Koizumi, Peter W. Hoiles

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor 9 8%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 39%
Environmental Science 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 36 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,373,602
of 22,522,311 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#79
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,593
of 248,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,522,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them