↓ Skip to main content

The measurement of stiffness of uterine smooth muscle tumor by elastography

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The measurement of stiffness of uterine smooth muscle tumor by elastography
Published in
SpringerPlus, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shigenori Furukawa, Shu Soeda, Takafumi Watanabe, Hiroshi Nishiyama, Keiya Fujimori

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Engineering 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,338,777
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#932
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,621
of 228,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#47
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.