↓ Skip to main content

Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms II: stably ergodic examples

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones Mathematicae, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms II: stably ergodic examples
Published in
Inventiones Mathematicae, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00222-016-0663-7
Authors

Christian Bonatti, Andrey Gogolev, Rafael Potrie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 3 150%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,721,582
of 5,285,691 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones Mathematicae
#170,579
of 339,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,034
of 186,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones Mathematicae
#140
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,285,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.