↓ Skip to main content

Analogue Gravity

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 150)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
443 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Analogue Gravity
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, May 2011
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2011-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Barceló, Stefano Liberati, Matt Visser

Abstract

Analogue gravity is a research programme which investigates analogues of general relativistic gravitational fields within other physical systems, typically but not exclusively condensed matter systems, with the aim of gaining new insights into their corresponding problems. Analogue models of (and for) gravity have a long and distinguished history dating back to the earliest years of general relativity. In this review article we will discuss the history, aims, results, and future prospects for the various analogue models. We start the discussion by presenting a particularly simple example of an analogue model, before exploring the rich history and complex tapestry of models discussed in the literature. The last decade in particular has seen a remarkable and sustained development of analogue gravity ideas, leading to some hundreds of published articles, a workshop, two books, and this review article. Future prospects for the analogue gravity programme also look promising, both on the experimental front (where technology is rapidly advancing) and on the theoretical front (where variants of analogue models can be used as a springboard for radical attacks on the problem of quantum gravity).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Canada 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 233 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 25%
Researcher 56 22%
Student > Master 28 11%
Professor 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 23 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 201 79%
Mathematics 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 27 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,609,914
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#34
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,601
of 124,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.