↓ Skip to main content

Analogue Gravity

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 104)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Analogue Gravity
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, May 2011
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2011-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Barceló, Stefano Liberati, Matt Visser

Abstract

Analogue gravity is a research programme which investigates analogues of general relativistic gravitational fields within other physical systems, typically but not exclusively condensed matter systems, with the aim of gaining new insights into their corresponding problems. Analogue models of (and for) gravity have a long and distinguished history dating back to the earliest years of general relativity. In this review article we will discuss the history, aims, results, and future prospects for the various analogue models. We start the discussion by presenting a particularly simple example of an analogue model, before exploring the rich history and complex tapestry of models discussed in the literature. The last decade in particular has seen a remarkable and sustained development of analogue gravity ideas, leading to some hundreds of published articles, a workshop, two books, and this review article. Future prospects for the analogue gravity programme also look promising, both on the experimental front (where technology is rapidly advancing) and on the theoretical front (where variants of analogue models can be used as a springboard for radical attacks on the problem of quantum gravity).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 189 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Researcher 50 23%
Student > Master 28 13%
Professor 22 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 7%
Other 45 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 180 83%
Unspecified 15 7%
Engineering 7 3%
Mathematics 7 3%
Philosophy 2 <1%
Other 5 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,385,451
of 13,213,864 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#35
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,400
of 232,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,213,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.