↓ Skip to main content

Experimental measurement of growth patterns on fossil corals: Secular variation in ancient Earth-Sun distances

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Science Bulletin, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Experimental measurement of growth patterns on fossil corals: Secular variation in ancient Earth-Sun distances
Published in
Chinese Science Bulletin, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11434-010-4197-x
Authors

WeiJia Zhang, ZhengBin Li, Yang Lei

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2010.
All research outputs
#2,919,007
of 12,514,212 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Science Bulletin
#73
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,979
of 233,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Science Bulletin
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,514,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them