↓ Skip to main content

Moving the debate forward: interculturalism’s contribution to multiculturalism

Overview of attention for article published in Comparative Migration Studies, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Moving the debate forward: interculturalism’s contribution to multiculturalism
Published in
Comparative Migration Studies, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40878-018-0078-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Boucher, Jocelyn Maclure

Abstract

In this article, we compare Ricard Zappata-Barrero's interculturalism with Tariq Modood's multiculturalism. We will discuss the relation between distinct elements that compose both positions. We examine how recent discussions on interculturalism have the potential to contribute to theories of multiculturalism without undermining their core principles. Our position is close to that of Modood's as he has already carefully tried to incorporate interculturalist insights into his own multiculturalism. Yet we provide a raise a few questions regarding Modood's treatment of the relation between multiculturalism and interculturalism. After summarizing each author's potion (I), we will comment on the following set of relations between their basic elements: (II) The relation between intercultural contact and intercultural dialogue; (III) The relation between contact at the local level and the societal/state level; (IV) The relation between group-specific measures, intercultural contact and mainstreaming.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 10 30%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 39%
Arts and Humanities 4 12%
Philosophy 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,561,721
of 13,755,409 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Migration Studies
#91
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,552
of 271,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Migration Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them