| Title |
Hafnia and hafnia-toughened ceramics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00541601 |
| Authors |
J. Wang, H. P. Li, R. Stevens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 33% |
| Researcher | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 76 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 34 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 28 | 12% |
| Engineering | 27 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2009.
All research outputs
#7,558,767
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,602
of 62,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#17
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.