↓ Skip to main content

Hafnia and hafnia-toughened ceramics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
352 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Hafnia and hafnia-toughened ceramics
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00541601
Authors

J. Wang, H. P. Li, R. Stevens

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 37%
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 55 43%
Physics and Astronomy 25 20%
Chemistry 18 14%
Engineering 15 12%
Unspecified 13 10%
Other 2 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2009.
All research outputs
#2,796,408
of 10,393,133 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#284
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,974
of 100,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,393,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.