↓ Skip to main content

Detection and characterization of new mutations in the human angiotensinogen gene (AGT)

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, July 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Detection and characterization of new mutations in the human angiotensinogen gene (AGT)
Published in
Human Genetics, July 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00214197
Authors

James E. Hixson, Patricia K. Powers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2008.
All research outputs
#1,811,965
of 11,214,196 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#216
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,087
of 135,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,214,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.