| Title |
Research agenda-setting on cash programming for health and nutrition in humanitarian settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-018-0035-6 |
| Authors |
Aniek Woodward, Andre Griekspoor, Shannon Doocy, Paul Spiegel, Kevin Savage |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 81% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#795,836
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#14
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,534
of 327,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.