↓ Skip to main content

Research agenda-setting on cash programming for health and nutrition in humanitarian settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Research agenda-setting on cash programming for health and nutrition in humanitarian settings
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41018-018-0035-6
Authors

Aniek Woodward, Andre Griekspoor, Shannon Doocy, Paul Spiegel, Kevin Savage

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 24%
Social Sciences 4 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#632,177
of 19,180,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#13
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,344
of 291,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,180,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them