↓ Skip to main content

Notchology-the effect of the notching method on the slow crack growth failure in a tough polyethylene

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Notchology-the effect of the notching method on the slow crack growth failure in a tough polyethylene
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00576763
Authors

X. Lu, R. Qian, N. Brown

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2001.
All research outputs
#2,783,635
of 10,323,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#281
of 1,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,335
of 99,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,323,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,901 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.