↓ Skip to main content

Localized EEG alpha feedback training: a possible technique for mapping subjective, conscious, and behavioral experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, October 1972
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Localized EEG alpha feedback training: a possible technique for mapping subjective, conscious, and behavioral experiences
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, October 1972
DOI 10.1007/bf00270673
Authors

Erik Peper

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 67%
Engineering 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 1995.
All research outputs
#2,781,694
of 10,311,177 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#72
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,250
of 98,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,311,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them