↓ Skip to main content

Gourmand New Caledonian crows munch rare escargots by dropping

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Gourmand New Caledonian crows munch rare escargots by dropping
Published in
Journal of Ethology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10164-013-0384-y
Authors

Keita D. Tanaka, Yuji Okahisa, Nozomu J. Sato, Jörn Theuerkauf, Keisuke Ueda

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Master 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 62%
Environmental Science 2 15%
Unspecified 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,872,361
of 12,546,831 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#167
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,658
of 233,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,546,831 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them