| Title |
GPU-enabled particle-particle particle-tree scheme for simulating dense stellar cluster system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40668-015-0010-1 |
| Authors |
Masaki Iwasawa, Simon Portegies Zwart, Junichiro Makino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 78% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,513,377
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology
#22
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,255
of 264,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them