↓ Skip to main content

Superplastic behaviour of a ceramic-based kappa/alpha Fe-10Al-1.9C material

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Superplastic behaviour of a ceramic-based kappa/alpha Fe-10Al-1.9C material
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf00354024
Authors

C. K. Teo, O. A. Ruano, J. Wadsworth, O. D. Sherby

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2004.
All research outputs
#2,767,135
of 10,258,653 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#254
of 1,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,548
of 117,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,258,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.