↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing the Uptake of Chemotherapeutic Drugs into Tumors using an “Artificial Lymphatic System”

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Enhancing the Uptake of Chemotherapeutic Drugs into Tumors using an “Artificial Lymphatic System”
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, May 2000
DOI 10.1114/1.298
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gene R. DiResta, Jongbin Lee, John H. Healey, Steven M. Larson, Ehud Arbit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,978
of 41,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them