↓ Skip to main content

In vitro somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of cassava

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, June 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
In vitro somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of cassava
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, June 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00268492
Pubmed ID
Authors

László Szabados, Rodrigo Hoyos, William Roca

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 5%
South Africa 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Researcher 3 14%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 55%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2006.
All research outputs
#7,557,888
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#779
of 2,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,436
of 12,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.