↓ Skip to main content

Single evoked potential reconstruction by means of wavelet transform

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, June 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

8 patents


123 Dimensions

Readers on

33 Mendeley
Single evoked potential reconstruction by means of wavelet transform
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, June 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00201024

E. A. Bartnik, K. J. Blinowska, P. J. Durka

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Algeria 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 33%
Professor 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Psychology 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Unspecified 3 9%
Other 9 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2009.
All research outputs
of 10,215,889 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 115,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,215,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them