↓ Skip to main content

At the Biological Modeling and Simulation Frontier

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
At the Biological Modeling and Simulation Frontier
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11095-009-9958-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Anthony Hunt, Glen E. P. Ropella, Tai Ning Lam, Jonathan Tang, Sean H. J. Kim, Jesse A. Engelberg, Shahab Sheikh-Bahaei

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
India 1 1%
China 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 82 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Computer Science 12 13%
Engineering 10 11%
Mathematics 5 5%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,611,089
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,024
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,936
of 92,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.