RT @RasmussenMagnus: There is a myth in Political Science. A myth that we can cleanly distinguish between «objective” and “subjective” meas…
RT @RasmussenMagnus: There is a myth in Political Science. A myth that we can cleanly distinguish between «objective” and “subjective” meas…
RT @RasmussenMagnus: There is a myth in Political Science. A myth that we can cleanly distinguish between «objective” and “subjective” meas…
There is a myth in Political Science. A myth that we can cleanly distinguish between «objective” and “subjective” measures of democracy. If you should take one thing from this great thread on measurement issues in regime studies it’s that this myth should
Note also that no serious democracy measure (that I’m aware of!) is truly reproducible in the sense that Przeworski describes in his tweet. This goes even for his and colleagues' binary, minimalist ACLP/DD measure. Alvarez et al 1996: https://t.co/j1sMDXfM
Eso que dice @clobo_guerrero es cierto, y en general, los especialistas consideran que la respuesta no puede ser dicotómica. Aunque noten que hay excepciones, por ej. https://t.co/pvxFVP4OL1