↓ Skip to main content

Internal representations for associative memory

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, September 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

2 patents


80 Dimensions

Readers on

57 Mendeley
2 CiteULike
Internal representations for associative memory
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, September 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00332910

E. B. Baum, J. Moody, F. Wilczek

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 11%
Brazil 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
China 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 33%
Researcher 12 21%
Professor 7 12%
Student > Master 5 9%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Engineering 7 12%
Psychology 7 12%
Unspecified 6 11%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
of 10,181,331 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 114,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,181,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them