↓ Skip to main content

Apoptosis in CHO cell batch cultures: examination by flow cytometry

Overview of attention for article published in Cytotechnology, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

17 patents


39 Dimensions

Readers on

25 Mendeley
Apoptosis in CHO cell batch cultures: examination by flow cytometry
Published in
Cytotechnology, January 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00749215

Alison Moore, Christopher J. Donahue, Jeff Hooley, Diana L. Stocks, Kenneth D. Bauer, Jennie P. Mather

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 32%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 40%
Chemical Engineering 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Engineering 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
of 10,158,538 outputs
Outputs from Cytotechnology
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 114,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytotechnology
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,158,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them