↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of paired human nasal and bronchial airway epithelial cell responses to rhinovirus infection and IL‐13 treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of paired human nasal and bronchial airway epithelial cell responses to rhinovirus infection and IL‐13 treatment
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40169-018-0189-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Roberts, Reem Al Mubarak, David Francisco, Monica Kraft, Hong Wei Chu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#770
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,502
of 342,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.