| Title |
Extraction and quantitation of astaxanthin from Phaffia rhodozyma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology Techniques, March 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00163282 |
| Authors |
J. James Sedmak, Deepthi K. Weerasinghe, Setsuko O. Jolly |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2002.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#827
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,350
of 14,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.