↓ Skip to main content

Effect of processing variables on texture and texture gradients in tantalum

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgical & Materials Transactions. Part A, September 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
20 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Effect of processing variables on texture and texture gradients in tantalum
Published in
Metallurgical & Materials Transactions. Part A, September 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02669871
Authors

J. B. Clark, R. K. Garrett, T. L. Jungling, R. A. Vandermeer, C. L. Vold

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 13%
China 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 50%
Professor 3 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 7 88%
Unspecified 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,333,110
of 11,788,586 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical & Materials Transactions. Part A
#96
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,632
of 259,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical & Materials Transactions. Part A
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them