↓ Skip to main content

The concept of heavy tamponades—chances and limitations

Overview of attention for article published in Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The concept of heavy tamponades—chances and limitations
Published in
Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00417-008-0861-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia M. Joussen, David Wong

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Netherlands 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 71%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,013,028
of 13,459,972 outputs
Outputs from Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#206
of 1,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,148
of 270,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,459,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.