↓ Skip to main content

Acquiring Multiview C-Arm Images to Assist Cardiac Ablation Procedures

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 103)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Acquiring Multiview C-Arm Images to Assist Cardiac Ablation Procedures
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing, January 2010
DOI 10.1155/2010/871409
Authors

Pascal Fallavollita

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 45%
Engineering 3 27%
Psychology 1 9%
Materials Science 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,731,526
of 10,123,657 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing
#9
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,604
of 114,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,123,657 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them