Title |
Carbon-13 NMR evidence for cocrystallization of cellulose as a mechanism for hornification of bleached kraft pulp
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cellulose, March 2004
|
DOI | 10.1023/b:cell.0000014768.28924.0c |
Authors |
Roger H. Newman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 29 | 29% |
Materials Science | 14 | 14% |
Engineering | 13 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 9 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#312
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,398
of 63,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.