↓ Skip to main content

Sequence Tag Catalogs of Dust Mite-Expressed Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of PharmacoGenomics, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Sequence Tag Catalogs of Dust Mite-Expressed Genomes
Published in
American Journal of PharmacoGenomics, January 2004
DOI 10.2165/00129785-200404060-00003
Authors

Aaron Chen Angus, Seow Theng Ong, Fook Tim Chew

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 8%
United States 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 42%
Researcher 2 17%
Unspecified 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 42%
Unspecified 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,921,098
of 13,232,126 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of PharmacoGenomics
#17
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,857
of 269,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of PharmacoGenomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,232,126 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them