↓ Skip to main content

Selective manipulation of a non-dominant plant and its herbivores affects an old-field plant community

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Ecology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Selective manipulation of a non-dominant plant and its herbivores affects an old-field plant community
Published in
Plant Ecology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11258-015-0487-3
Authors

Tania N. Kim, Brian J. Spiesman, Amanda L. Buchanan, Alyssa S. Hakes, Stacey L. Halpern, Brian D. Inouye, Allyssa L. Kilanowski, Nicholas Kortessis, David W. McNutt, Andrew C. Merwin, Nora Underwood

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 60%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 80%
Unspecified 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2015.
All research outputs
#9,841,992
of 12,323,473 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#328
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,036
of 238,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,323,473 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.