↓ Skip to main content

Brane-World Gravity

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
598 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Brane-World Gravity
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, June 2004
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2004-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy Maartens

Abstract

The observable universe could be a 1 + 3-surface (the "brane") embedded in a 1 + 3 + d-dimensional spacetime (the "bulk"), with Standard Model particles and fields trapped on the brane while gravity is free to access the bulk. At least one of the d extra spatial dimensions could be very large relative to the Planck scale, which lowers the fundamental gravity scale, possibly even down to the electroweak (∼ TeV) level. This revolutionary picture arises in the framework of recent developments in M theory. The 1 + 10-dimensional M theory encompasses the known 1 + 9-dimensional superstring theories, and is widely considered to be a promising potential route to quantum gravity. General relativity cannot describe gravity at high enough energies and must be replaced by a quantum gravity theory, picking up significant corrections as the fundamental energy scale is approached. At low energies, gravity is localized at the brane and general relativity is recovered, but at high energies gravity "leaks" into the bulk, behaving in a truly higher-dimensional way. This introduces significant changes to gravitational dynamics and perturbations, with interesting and potentially testable implications for high-energy astrophysics, black holes, and cosmology. Brane-world models offer a phenomenological way to test some of the novel predictions and corrections to general relativity that are implied by M theory. This review discusses the geometry, dynamics and perturbations of simple brane-world models for cosmology and astrophysics, mainly focusing on warped 5-dimensional brane-worlds based on the Randall-Sundrum models.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 67%
Italy 1 33%
South Africa 1 33%
France 1 33%
Taiwan 1 33%
Japan 1 33%
China 1 33%
Chile 1 33%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 8 267%
Researcher 7 233%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 233%
Student > Postgraduate 3 100%
Professor 3 100%
Other 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 27 900%
Unspecified 2 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#10,966,360
of 12,365,836 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#100
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,794
of 236,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,365,836 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.