↓ Skip to main content

New insights on fumed colloidal rheology—shear thickening and vorticity-aligned structures in flocculating dispersions

Overview of attention for article published in Rheologica Acta, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 224)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
New insights on fumed colloidal rheology—shear thickening and vorticity-aligned structures in flocculating dispersions
Published in
Rheologica Acta, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00397-008-0341-9
Authors

Ajay Singh Negi, Chinedum O. Osuji

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 4%
China 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 43%
Researcher 8 16%
Professor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 31%
Physics and Astronomy 11 22%
Materials Science 9 18%
Unspecified 6 12%
Chemical Engineering 4 8%
Other 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,805,996
of 12,936,999 outputs
Outputs from Rheologica Acta
#39
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,105
of 270,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheologica Acta
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,936,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them