↓ Skip to main content

DNA vaccines for HIV: challenges and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Springer Seminars in Immunopathology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 127)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
DNA vaccines for HIV: challenges and opportunities
Published in
Springer Seminars in Immunopathology, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00281-006-0046-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Hokey, David B. Weiner

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Unspecified 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,026,261
of 13,494,857 outputs
Outputs from Springer Seminars in Immunopathology
#34
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,120
of 270,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Springer Seminars in Immunopathology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,494,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them