↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive genetic assessment provides evidence of extensive gene flow and possible high movement ability in the African golden wolf

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Biology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive genetic assessment provides evidence of extensive gene flow and possible high movement ability in the African golden wolf
Published in
Mammalian Biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.mambio.2018.05.002
Authors

Yamna Karssene, Mohsen Chammem, Carsten Nowak, Koen de Smet, Diana Castro, Ahmed Eddine, Susana Lopes, Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes, Berardino Cocchiararo, Dick Klees, Peter Van Der Leer, Said Nouira, Raquel Godinho

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Unspecified 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,842,344
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Biology
#203
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,220
of 269,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Biology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.