↓ Skip to main content

Effect of epidural versus general anaesthesia on peroperative blood loss during retropubic prostatectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, December 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Effect of epidural versus general anaesthesia on peroperative blood loss during retropubic prostatectomy
Published in
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, December 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf02081981
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Hendolin, E. Alhava

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 36%
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 73%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#417
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,041
of 33,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them