↓ Skip to main content

Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Game Theory, December 1973
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 191)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
652 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points
Published in
International Journal of Game Theory, December 1973
DOI 10.1007/bf01737554
Authors

John C. Harsanyi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Japan 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 126 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 31%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 54 39%
Engineering 11 8%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,713,704
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#7
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350
of 18,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them