↓ Skip to main content

PCR based molecular characterization of Nepenthes khasiana Hook. f.—pitcher plant

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
PCR based molecular characterization of Nepenthes khasiana Hook. f.—pitcher plant
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10722-009-9444-0
Authors

B. S. Bhau, K. Medhi, T. Sarkar, S. P. Saikia

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Costa Rica 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Malaysia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 74%
Environmental Science 6 14%
Unspecified 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2009.
All research outputs
#3,537,696
of 12,319,743 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#152
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,424
of 238,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,319,743 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.