@Mialibs @SelenaAnaRg @SlauHaus @DrSebastianBarr Sorry you don’t recognise facts, but that’s not my problem. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/SRowHFA0Yn
@LoicMikus @ignotus223 @Sargon_of_Akkad https://t.co/EKRydukOGO so your saying a governmental agency would just lie and make up that transgenderism and gender dysphoria as mental illnesses. btw that same government support lgbt so..........................
@borgman151 @amayadeakins @Timcast We can use the DSM-5, just force them to acknowledge why it was reclassified—specifically, that it had nothing to do with the psychiatric realities of Gender Identity Disorder but rather was a political move intended to d
@mirjamcigri Baudet heeft geen woord gelogen! https://t.co/XnzHM3I6ig.
@Skelderellie @MaxBoxtel Lees maar even terug. En als je daar te lui voor bent kan je het hier vinden: Gender Dysphoria DSM-5 302.85 (F64.9). En als je het leuk vindt, is hier nog een artikel over de naamswijziging en de activistische translobby. https:
@g_g_g_hh DSM-5で性同一性障害という言葉は無くなったのですが、トランスジェンダーだと診断するのにやはり性的違和があることは要求しているそうです。https://t.co/lekGvKnZGj
@chang__air DSM-5は「伊達や酔狂でトランスする偽物と本物のGIDを区別」しているみたいですけどね。DSM-5の解説論文 https://t.co/lekGvKnZGj を参照すると、
@dan_boresjo @LizJone55098804 @SwipeWright APA's manual can't be trusted, DSM compilers have vested interests. APA downgraded Gender ID Disorder to pseudoscientific Gender Dysphoria for political reasons, to destigmatize it: https://t.co/ZfKLSZ6k27 APA's
@EthanPace16 @Renevelation @AquariumSmith @CarpeDonktum No, I meant exactly what I said. And that’s what happened. Read the abstract here. It’s all feelings, activists and political considerations. Zero science. https://t.co/WVwyyR4a0I
@akafacehots 2015 it was changed and now it's removed in 2017 as a diagnosis https://t.co/XzFWwmGBf4
@LittleKrissyBoo @AriDrennen Its old but here is one: https://t.co/gsCioW8jOo
We already have laws in place that prevent individuals with certain mental health disorders from purchasing and possessing firearms… this is why we are experiencing the recent tragedy…
Please educate yourselves as to the reason the APA re-categorized General Identity Disorder (GID) in the DSM-V (the Diagnostic Manual of Psychological Disorders) to GD, Gender Dysmorphia. Specifically pay attention to the role Big Pharma plays…. https://t
@Reuters Trans people are in a classification of numerous (and needed) psychological areas that obviously point towards this phenomenon as a mental disorder. DSM-5 is a good place to start. https://t.co/kmtY41b81b
@edlfix @BettrCallSowell @cmikehawke @JEHutton @libsoftiktok @CUNY It was more than just stigma, but was a primary reason given. The other was to reflect ten years of research and a desire to more accurately reflect that. This was in 2013, years before it
@3DoBetter3 @ThePerfHouswife @ClintLong2003 @bennyjohnson Again, your own source has an entire paper dedicated to navigating various political and activist groups in redefining the diagnosis. So yes, they are being influenced by more than just evidence-bas
@JodieFosterArmy @LouMill90 @KatyMontgomerie @radabolitionism @MrsNickyClark @bbcnickrobinson GNC behaviour was not pathologised independently, only when accompanied by sex-related distress. This continues in the DSM5, although it’s more inconsistent. ht
@azuredawn9 @RealUSCitizen1 @MayNotBeJoking @RealJamesWoods No, I’m not an expert and I never claimed to be. Before you make wild claims about my ignorance and assumption making being based on fear you could research who’s actually being oppressed and do y
@GarvinFord @JackPosobiec Ya, I’ll keep that in mind. https://t.co/ocMUEwUJmu
@RANZCP “The article then demonstrates how the trans anti-pathologization movement has challenged the perceived pathologizing effects of the DSM-5 classification of GD.” https://t.co/TBLdPlfeC7
@RANZCP “The article then demonstrates how the trans anti-pathologization movement has challenged the perceived pathologizing effects of the DSM-5 classification of GD.” https://t.co/TBLdPlxnQf
@transphobecring This doesn't fit perfectly but the end of the abstract serves my general point. The paper itself most likely does not. https://t.co/R4ibcm9RDO
@EgbertPPB @JamesEsses It is political because the term was contested based on ideological rather than medical grounds. https://t.co/BB1bBUhXh8
@So_sick_of_all @Nemesis15806726 Laut Wiki-Fußnote: https://t.co/RsOnZbu49c Weiß nicht, ob es das DOI auch noch woanders mit mehr Inhalt gibt, kann bei Interesse gerne schauen.
@RabbitResist @TheCarinaCrow @EliErlick I'll leave this here. https://t.co/zEeokbRwp3
@rustyslimjim @alwaysjaded00 @shewasmyfriend @AmandaPCraig Look, it's OK. I'll seek answers elsewhere. Dictionaries are not the only indication of significant change: https://t.co/Dz73apZRY7.
@cheese_macking @zyn6coolmint @TerjeCS @salubrioche @theserfstv Haha, as a matter of fact, yes. The definition of trans in the DSM was changed for political reasons, not medical reasons. https://t.co/yjgtyR7QzN
@DarzoPerez @Omar72130625 @ELTIEMPO «No sé usar Google» pero «mándeme una página científica» 🤡 Andaba desconectado, pero acá le dejo dos. https://t.co/Y1zwl5eb5o https://t.co/oZJS6iH7eM Este es de derecho (ya que dice ser abogado): https://t.co/QQFx01q
@destroyed4com4t @John60943060 @Xather2 @MonstaTofu @stonewalluk @KatyMontgomerie This is closer to how transgender is considered at the scientific level in later years (though it's a few years ago now, but much more recent than 1985): https://t.co/fkbPsaX
@PrtlyEstrogn8td @chudsommeleir @BlanchardPhD Haha, read up on how that was a completely political move, and not grounded in actual science. https://t.co/yjgtyQQfbd
@christapeterso got three articles here, they don't address agp specifically but frame the scientific context it emerged from as a diagnosis in a bunch of different ways and are super relevant to what you've been reading imo https://t.co/DcP1BNuKie https:/
@JacobRAdkins @ChristianWalk1r https://t.co/eH69UFxXTZ the DSM-5 is also extremely politicized, just use common sense, what do you think the problem is?? Just considering all of the mental health problems that arise when being gender dysphoric, is it not o
@Shae_AR Yeah? Please give me an example of new, peer reviewed, science data that led to this change. On the other hand... https://t.co/lamZKEyyIu
@WhimsicalPuck A phobia suggests fear, what is there to be afraid of, certainly not a mental disorder. Further, transphobia can't be found anywhere in the DSM5. And if you were looking for real position papers on the matter you would find this one https:/
😂🥳🤣
@ThatSecretWrit1 @Luke56619077 @myqkaplan Here, I found the information you want to pretend doesn't exist: https://t.co/6g9gTbC9IB Yeah, there's a difference. I'm trying to draw a correlation. That's a fancy word that means that things are similar.
The DSM-5 and the Politics of Diagnosing Transpeople. #psychology https://t.co/pap7AaGTZR
RT @psychoBOBlogy: The DSM-5 and the Politics of Diagnosing Transpeople | Archives of Sexual Behavior http://t.co/FBKeqMZryV
New item: The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople: Davy, Zowie (2015) The DSM-5 and the politics... http://t.co/mJguPzeqyX
The DSM-5 and the Politics of Diagnosing Transpeople | Archives of Sexual Behavior http://t.co/FBKeqMZryV
The DSM-5 and the Politics of Diagnosing Transpeople | Archives of Sexual Behavior http://t.co/FBKeqMZryV
The DSM-5 and the Politics of Diagnosing Transpeople | Archives of Sexual Behavior http://t.co/FBKeqMZryV