@benwr @freed_dfilan https://t.co/ucFHRe1nqH (I didn't take the time to find a better graph or sanity check the paper) https://t.co/LmeAPth07k
This is an interesting study about assessment criteria in scientific publishing https://t.co/g64yUpaz0o
@mattyglesias Looks like it’s not! https://t.co/jfBzqBu6JC
@matthiasellis Like Yglesias, I don't know shit about shit, but I also did a very quick search, and while this shouldn't be the only source to disprove his notably awful thesis, it sure doesn't help his case: https://t.co/i1Zd4U0lfx
@Wungkhong 🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️ 读一读,教育一下自己 别继续自信满满地自欺欺人了 https://t.co/31Pqwwnvxx https://t.co/GAkh0sqZJN https://t.co/Fb30zJOD2x https://t.co/kMMALy07vo
Scientific publications should return to monographs. Avoid writing papers that have same introduction, methods and discussion with just a small update of results. Some authors, you only have to read their name to know what’s in their paper! Avoid science b
RT @rabernat: @helenafricker How do you reconcile this advice with the exponentially growing volume of the scientific literature? You can'…
@helenafricker How do you reconcile this advice with the exponentially growing volume of the scientific literature? You can't read it all. When has an ECR read "enough"? Who decides which papers are worth reading? https://t.co/tD8r9yQ7da
#365papers #365artigos 14 - The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index / Peder Olesen Larsen, Markus von Ins (2010) https://t.co/XLeSeHf0vi
The rate of growth in scientific publication https://t.co/Xr4rDHh6WC https://t.co/MEUaUuGO6f
RT @AlmaDzibGoodin: The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index https://t.c…
The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index https://t.co/o8ESsZmuLF
The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index https://t.co/uWApXONYFX
No. articles in scientific corpus in ~10 years time will eclipse that already out there https://t.co/JH70NBrDQG make new works OA by default
The # of published #science papers increases ~4.7% per year. Ok to remember 5/100 facts each year then? #statistics http://t.co/CN3sZbwwGV
The rate of growth in #Scientific #Publication and the decline in coverage provided by #Science Citation Index | http://t.co/dqAEuutPVU
The rate of growth in #Scientific #Publication and the decline in coverage provided by #Science Citation Index | http://t.co/dqAEuutPVU
The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index http://t.co/ijOjIPmovk
@claireoconnell this is why no-one cares: http://t.co/nmLFypwYft and this http://t.co/QmT3FDFGAh
.@dmaccannell @tdread_emory The fact remains that with some 2M articles/year ( http://t.co/9Xp3SvoPZx says 1.3M in '06) too many to do 1/2
@AdamRutherford From 2010: "...the number of serious scientific journals today most likely is about 24,000." http://t.co/P3d3QvFyp6
@mpigliucci @DJGrothe actually there seems to exist a good growth on the number of papers -> http://t.co/BGLVSNheS1
Paper discussed by @duarteoceans analyzing growth of scientific publications trends: http://t.co/Lp5aHF9Mpg
The exponential growth of science journals and papers published. LOVE A GOOD LOG GRAPH http://t.co/lZXtRg2l6r
Scientific literature growing exponentially but citation indexes covering ever less of it. Paper in Scientometrics http://t.co/FgU2m4g8kt
@TheBradBlog http://t.co/t94FM2HJns I wasn't trying to pick on anyone. Sorry for miscommunication.
@mc_hankins @todd_gureckis seems like it's growing exponentially as well http://t.co/Ebb95Wp4rE
@mc_hankins @todd_gureckis seems like it's growing exponentially as well http://t.co/Ebb95Wp4rE
@carlzimmer In 2006 about 1,350,000 articles were published in peer-reviewed journals. http://t.co/Ym8konT8RG
@carlzimmer More info here, though out of date http://t.co/KngGD2cex7
@carlzimmer @PubPeer In 2006 about 1,350,000 articles were published in peer-reviewed journals. http://t.co/Ym8konT8RG
#psp2014. That means that journals read/reader prob increased faster than total journals/reader- http://t.co/KMGCn4svsQ
El incremento en número de artículos en publicaciones "peer-review" se mantiene en los últimos 50 años. No... http://t.co/ZpJzfGsKSc