| Title |
Rumor response, debunking response, and decision makings of misinformed Twitter users during disasters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-018-3344-6 |
| Authors |
Bairong Wang, Jun Zhuang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| Chile | 3 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 14% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 588. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#40,086
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#3
of 2,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#876
of 340,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.