↓ Skip to main content

Far field damage on RC buildings: the case study of Navelli during the L’Aquila (Italy) seismic sequence, 2009

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 178)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Far field damage on RC buildings: the case study of Navelli during the L’Aquila (Italy) seismic sequence, 2009
Published in
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10518-010-9201-y
Authors

M. Mucciarelli, M. Bianca, R. Ditommaso, M. R. Gallipoli, A. Masi, C. Milkereit, S. Parolai, M. Picozzi, M. Vona

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 41%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 26%
Unspecified 6 22%
Computer Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2012.
All research outputs
#3,836,834
of 13,016,685 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#41
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,547
of 233,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,016,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.